# AI and Employment Fairness: How Design, Audits, and Compliance Work Together

Findem publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.findem.ai/lazyweb/agent-access.

Source: https://www.findem.ai/webinars/ai-and-employment-fairness
Source observed: 2026-11-02T22:04:41.474Z
Last checked: 2026-11-12T19:01:04.52+00:00
Indexed: 2026-11-02T22:15:31.394+00:00

---

---
title: "AI and Employment Fairness | Findem"
description: "How AI architecture shapes hiring fairness: bias by design, audit methodology, and compliance — with Tina Shah Paikeday and Jeffrey Pole of Warden AI."
url: "https://www.findem.ai/webinars/ai-and-employment-fairness"
---

# AI and Employment Fairness: How Design, Audits, and Compliance Work Together

← Back to webinars

- Tina Shah Paikeday Findem
- Jeffrey Pole Warden AI

## Watch the webinar

**Form:** complete it on the page in a browser.  
Fields: First name (required); Last name (required); Company name (required); Email (required); Job title (required); Employees (required).

## Overview

Most conversations about AI and bias start with the audit results. The more important question is whether the tool was designed fairly in the first place.

In this session, Tina Shah Paikeday, Responsible AI Senior Adviser at Findem, and Jeffrey Pole, Co-Founder and CEO of Warden AI, cover both sides of the problem: what responsible AI design looks like in hiring, and what rigorous compliance auditing actually requires. Tina draws on cognitive bias research to explain why some AI tools accelerate the biases humans already carry — and why others don't.

Jeffrey brings audit data showing where bias is appearing in hiring today, what the regulatory landscape looks like as state-level legislation accelerates, and how purpose-built AI systems compare to human-only processes on fairness measures.

Watch to leave with a sharper framework for evaluating the AI in your hiring stack — and better questions to ask your vendors.

## Key takeaways

- Why AI architecture — not bias-mitigation programs layered on top — determines whether a hiring tool produces fair outcomes
- What position-level audit methodology and the Stanford algorithmic monoculture study mean for how you read vendor audit results
- How purpose-built AI systems compare to human-powered hiring on bias, according to Warden AI's meta-analysis across gender and race/ethnicity data

## Speakers

- Tina Shah Paikeday Responsible AI Senior Adviser Findem
- Jeffrey Pole Co-founder & CEO Warden AI


---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.findem.ai/lazyweb/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.findem.ai%2Fwebinars%2Fai-and-employment-fairness&trace=t_9544b0955d7a)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Findem’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Include your question in q. All research inputs are optional; no account or setup.

`GET https://www.findem.ai/lazyweb/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_9544b0955d7a`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.findem.ai/lazyweb/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.findem.ai/lazyweb/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.findem.ai/lazyweb/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.findem.ai%2Fwebinars%2Fai-and-employment-fairness). Opening a form does not execute a tool.